![]() ![]() Stona(the CM) is also well aware that Japan and Korea have no technical relevance with each other. (Unlike South Africa in the UK and Finland in Sweden) So it is not a good idea to claim that Japan can have South Korean equipment without any basis. In addition, Japan does not share particular military/technical ties with South Korea. For example, one demanding the addition of Egypt/Jordan/Saudi/Syria as a subtree to fill Israel’s lack of equipment could be problematic. Some might ask “ Why not implement SK as a subtree for Japan? Japan is suffering from a lack of top tier vehicles!” However, this would cause problems from a historical point of view. As a standalone tree: The approach we are proposing in this thread. North Korea causes a dilemma between the USSR or China, since the historical development of vehicles is not fully dependent on a single nation. Even though it’s implemented as a certain country’s subtree, the top rank tech tree would be overwhelmed by South Korean vehicles which might surpass the implemented nation’s vehicle timeline. As a sub-tree: Also too much volume of vehicles. The only country with technical relevance to South Korea is the United States, but the United States already has more than enough event vehicles, which makes South Korean event vehicles rather redundant. ![]() As GE/Pack/BP/Event Premiums: Too much volume of vehicles to implement in this option. There are 3 ways to implement South and North Korean vehicles in this game. Why should it be implemented as a standalone tree? To solidify this, I felt the need of providing an aviation tech tree suggestion.ī. This suggestion, along with the United Korean Ground Forces proposal above, aims to form a independent(stand-alone) faction Korea, like Israel. From ‘Answering Your Questions’ in the WT Official channel, BVV_d mentioned in the affirmative a possibility of Korea being a new nation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |